Goethe-Zertifikat B2 · Sprechen
DiscussionDiscussing

Goethe B2 Speaking Part 2 – Discussion

In Part 2 you discuss a question with your partner. Here’s how to exchange arguments and reach a conclusion.

As of 2026 · Built to the official exam format

1
Tasks
48
Points

Key takeaways

  • You discuss a controversial question with your partner and exchange arguments.
  • Defend your opinion, respond to your partner and reach a conclusion.

What this part tests

Part 2 tests whether you can discuss a controversial question with a partner. You get a question or topic (e.g. “Sollte man …?”) and exchange your opinions and arguments.

It’s about real interaction: defending and justifying your opinion, addressing your partner’s arguments, agreeing or disagreeing with reasons, asking follow-up questions and reaching a joint conclusion or compromise at the end.

The most common losses of marks: only holding your own opinion without addressing your partner, or discussing impolitely. Whoever responds actively and argues objectively convinces.

What you practice:DiscussingResponding to argumentsFinding a consensus

How to approach it

  1. 1

    State your opinion on the question and justify it.

  2. 2

    Listen to your partner’s arguments carefully.

  3. 3

    Agree or disagree with reasons and objectively.

  4. 4

    Ask follow-up questions and address your partner’s points.

  5. 5

    Try to reach a joint conclusion or compromise at the end.

Example task with answer

A short example in the same format: how to discuss and respond to your partner.

Aufgabe

Diskutieren Sie die Frage „Sollte in Innenstädten ein Tempolimit von 30 km/h gelten?". Tauschen Sie Argumente aus und versuchen Sie, zu einem Ergebnis zu kommen.

Example phrases (extract):

Answer: Ich bin der Meinung, dass Tempo 30 sinnvoll ist, weil es die Unfälle reduziert und weniger Lärm macht. – Da stimme ich dir teilweise zu, allerdings würde der Verkehr dann langsamer fließen. Wie siehst du das? – Das stimmt, aber für die Sicherheit von Fußgängern und Radfahrern lohnt es sich. – Einverstanden. Vielleicht könnte man Tempo 30 vor allem in Wohngebieten einführen. – Ja, das wäre ein guter Kompromiss.

Why? The example defends a justified opinion, addresses the partner (agree + counter-argument + follow-up question), stays objective and finds a compromise at the end – exactly what Part 2 expects.

Practice: test yourself

In Teil 2 diskutiert ihr die Frage „Sollte das Studium kostenlos sein?". Dein Partner ist dafür.

Which sentence responds well to the partner’s argument?

Common mistakes

1
Not addressing your partner

A discussion is not a monologue. Respond to your partner’s arguments.

2
Disagreeing impolitely

Disagree objectively and politely, not personally or harshly.

3
Not justifying your opinion

Justify every opinion with an argument or example.

4
No conclusion

Try to reach a joint conclusion or compromise at the end.

Tips

  • Learn phrases for agreeing, disagreeing and asking back.
  • Listen actively and refer to your partner’s statements.
  • Stay objective and polite, even when you disagree.

Frequently asked questions

What do I have to do in Part 2?

Discuss a controversial question with your partner: defend your opinion, address their arguments and seek a joint conclusion.

How do I respond well to my partner?

With phrases for agreeing and disagreeing, by referring to their statements and asking follow-up questions.

Does there have to be a conclusion at the end?

A good discussion reaches a joint conclusion or compromise at the end. That feels complete.

What’s the best way to practice Part 2?

Discuss controversial questions with a partner and practice responding. A Prepliq mock grades your speaking automatically against the official criteria.

Other parts

Useful resources

Back to overview · Sprechen