Goethe-Zertifikat C1 · Lesen
MatchingRecognizing & locating opinions

Goethe C1 Reading Part 4 – Match Opinions

In Part 4 you read contributions from several specialists and match statements to the right people. Here’s how to grasp the positions reliably.

As of 2026 · Built to the official exam format

7
Tasks
7
Points

Key takeaways

  • You read contributions from several specialists and match 7 statements: who says this?
  • Two statements fit no one – mark 0 in that case.

What this part tests

Part 4 tests whether you grasp, distinguish and locate the opinions and statements of several specialists precisely. You read several (popular-)scientific contributions (people A–E) and match seven statements: who says this? Two statements fit no one – then you mark 0.

It’s about precise opinion and detail comprehension: each person has their own position with fine differences, often in demanding language. The statements are paraphrased. You must recognize the exact position, not just a shared topic.

The difficulty: several people speak about the same topic, and some statements fit no one. Watch each person’s exact stance. Every correct match scores points; wrong answers are not penalized.

What you practice:Grasping opinionsDistinguishing positionsLocating statements

How to approach it

  1. 1

    Read the contributions for an overview and summarize each person’s position.

  2. 2

    Read the first statement and consider which position it fits.

  3. 3

    In the matching contribution, find the spot that confirms the statement.

  4. 4

    If no person fits, mark 0 – that applies to two statements.

  5. 5

    Compare similar positions especially carefully.

  6. 6

    Transfer your answers to the answer sheet in good time.

Example task with answer

A short example in the same format: match the statement to the right person.

Du liest (sinngemäß)

Thema „Künstliche Intelligenz". Person A: „KI wird viele Routineaufgaben übernehmen und uns entlasten." Person B: „Ohne klare Regeln birgt KI erhebliche Risiken für die Gesellschaft."

Who warns above all of the dangers? (a) Person A · (b) Person B

Answer: b

Why? Person B emphasizes “erhebliche Risiken … ohne klare Regeln” – that’s the warning. Person A sees above all the relief offered by AI.

Practice: test yourself

Mehrere Fachleute äußern sich zum Thema „Datenschutz". Person A (sinngemäß): „Wer seine Daten bewusst sparsam preisgibt, schützt sich am besten." Person B (sinngemäß): „Unternehmen, die den Datenschutz vernachlässigen, werden Kunden verlieren."

Who emphasizes the users’ own responsibility?

Common mistakes

1
Watching only the topic

A shared topic doesn’t make the match right. Grasp the exact position.

2
Forgetting the 0 option

Two statements fit no one. Recognize them and mark 0.

3
Confusing similar positions

Two people can mean almost the same thing. Compare the fine points.

4
Leaving boxes blank

No answer means a guaranteed zero. Match every statement (or mark 0).

Tips

  • Summarize each person’s position in one keyword.
  • Keep in mind that two statements fit no one (0).
  • Practice reading specialist contributions and opinion texts on a topic.

Frequently asked questions

How many tasks does reading Part 4 have?

Seven. You match seven statements to several specialist contributions; two statements fit no one (mark 0).

What does the answer 0 mean?

That the statement fits none of the people. Two of the seven statements get the answer 0.

Are wrong answers penalized?

No. There is no penalty – match every statement.

What’s the best way to practice Part 4?

Read specialist contributions on a topic and practice grasping and matching positions precisely. In a Prepliq mock you practice this with instant scoring.

Other parts

Useful resources

Back to overview · Lesen